Facts/Issues Plaintiff submitted a modification package to be reviewed for the Making Home Affordable Modification Program. The lender took so long to review Plaintiff's application that the added arrears to Plaintiff's loan balance made Plaintiff ineligible for the HAMP modification. Resolution LAWSUIT IS ONGOING … [Read more...] about ARMOR V. BANK OF AMERICA, ET. AL. (SAN FRANCISCO- CASE NO. CGC 12 523629)
Consumer Action Law Group Ongoing Cases
DANIEL V. ONEWEST ET. AL. (CASE NO. MC023824)
Facts/Issues Plaintiff inherited property from his mother and obtained a loan from Indymac shortly thereafter. Plaintiff paid his property taxes directly to the tax assessor. Plaintiff then transferred the home to his personal trust. Upon the transfer to his trust, the tax assessor mistakenly reassessed the value of Plaintiff's home and increased his property taxes. Plaintiff disputed the increase with the tax assessor and advised his lender (Indymac transferred to Ocwen) of the mistake. … [Read more...] about DANIEL V. ONEWEST ET. AL. (CASE NO. MC023824)
DANIEL V. CHASE ET. AL. (CASE NO. BC460007)
Facts/Issues Plaintiff inherited a home from his mother and obtained a loan from Washington Mutual shortly thereafter. Plaintiff paid his property taxes directly to the tax assessor. Plaintiff then transferred the home to his personal trust. Upon the transfer to his trust, the tax assessor mistakenly reassessed the value of Plaintiff's home and increased his property taxes. Plaintiff disputed the increase with the tax assessor and advised his lender (Washington Mutual transferred to Chase) … [Read more...] about DANIEL V. CHASE ET. AL. (CASE NO. BC460007)
WASHINGTON V. OCWEN, ET. AL.
Facts/Issues Plaintiff is a 99 year old woman. After the passing of her husband, she received a permanent modification from her lender. Ocwen improperly escrowed her taxes and insurance and therefore increased her monthly mortgage payments. Resolution: Lawsuit is Ongoing … [Read more...] about WASHINGTON V. OCWEN, ET. AL.
LUU V. CHASE, SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, ET. AL. (CASE NO. VC063929)
Facts/Issues Plaintiff was always current on his mortgage payments. Plaintiff received letters and statements from Chase stating he had $33,000 in his escrow account. Any amount over $50 in an escrow account must be distributed to the borrower. Chase never distributed these funds to Plaintiff. After transferring the servicing of Plaintiff's loan to SPS, SPS claimed Plaintiff was in default. Resolution LAWSUIT IS ONGOING … [Read more...] about LUU V. CHASE, SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, ET. AL. (CASE NO. VC063929)